Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > * Ian Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060726 13:18]: >> But, for example, foo <-Depends-> foo-data is not usually an example >> of a silly dependency. > > Actually, there is no reason why foo-data needs foo configured before > being configured, but there might be reason for the other direction. > Why not inventing some new "Depends-for-being-useful" from foo-data to > foo, and having Depends cycle-free?
What about using Suggests instead of "Depends-for-being-useful"? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
