On Jul 18, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Because there is no reason to do this, this is not a standard issue but > > plain operations. > Really? So you think the IETF would happily issue a statement > agreeing? Yes.
> Of course, the facts are that the IETF regards graylisting as a > violation of the email protocols and not to be implemented. When (and how?) did the IETF express such an opinion? -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
