Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said: >> And finally, if we don't care about standards conformance, I have said >> that a good second-best is to document exactly what our requirements >> are, rather than burying them in apparent secrecy. > > What standards, exactly? Can you be specific? I have seen you assert > this several times, but I see nothing in the RFCs preventing a site from > saying it has a temporary local problem when it doesn't. You've been > asked this before in response to your assertion, and haven't answered.
So the meaning of 4xx is "temporary local problem". Sending that when you don't have a temporary local problem is a violation, right there. Must the standard repeat after every sentence, "oh, and don't lie". Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
