ke, 2006-06-28 kello 18:43 +0200, Adam Borowski kirjoitti: > What do you think about going with Don Armstrong's suggestion > ($CONCURRENCY_LEVEL), while handling the default (no env var) my > way (decent memory => parallel, little memory => -j 1) instead of > Ingo's (-j 1 unless explicitely set)?
I'm in favor of Ingo's approach. I don't think it is a good idea to hardcode assumptions of what is sufficient memory size into rules files; that's the kind of thing that is best done centrally. (Also, any rules file snippet should be as simple as possible. Otherwise fixing it everywhere when a bug is found is going to be tedious.) -- Connection resented by peer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
