On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 03:23:09PM -0300, Maximiliano Curia wrote: > On Friday 19 May 2006 10:25, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > So, instead of using static feature lists to define an application's > > priority with which it would be configured in the alternatives system, > > why not use popcon data to do that instead? Using popcon would ensure > > that the applications which most people prefer would be the default; > > this is a fair and objective criterion. > > You would end up with nvi or nano as editors, since they are installed by > default. Probably more as viewer and so on.
Which is bad why? -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
