Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you have a look at the order of the by_vote numbers for editors, > you'll see that vim, not nvi or nano, is at the top.
A list like this only seems meaningful if the entries are fairly consistent with each other. For instance, if you have packages like: PACKAGE NAME USE COUNT ----------------------------------------- EDITOR-1 123 EDITOR-2-VERSION-3 55 EDITOR-2-VERSION-3.1 49 EDITOR-2-VERSION-4 73 The package "EDITOR-1" is "more popular" than any other _package_, but one could also fairly say that EDITOR-2 is actually more popular than EDITOR-1 in general. Which should be higher priority? -Miles -- Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here, beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]