Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le Mer 10 Mai 2006 11:05, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : >> Do you see any drawbacks with my proposal of having Release.key next >> to each Releas.gpg or do you have a better idea that will work for >> every apt-getable archive? > > this is obviously a valid idea, except that you have to have those key > over https to avoid MiM attacks, with a valid https CA (like in not > self-signed).
Why? The key is signed and thereby protected from alterations and the signatures can be checked against the existing keyring package. The idea is to validate against more than one off-server key that has a long long lifetime, like maintainers keys. More than one to avoid any single point of failure or attack. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]