Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 05:35:35PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: >> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Seconds, since when do we consider the GPL to be viral? >> >> Don't know about you, but the FSF does - it has created the LGPL because >> of this. > > Actually, they don't.
I don't know whether this discussion is good for anything, I think we are just misunderstanding each other. Maybe we should just stop - You are arguing that the GPL is a good license for a library, but I'm not arguing against it. I'm only saying that it's "viral", but that's just a consequence of the idea of copyleft in my view, and it's intended and just what you want when you choose GPL. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
