On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:36:47PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > Those cases can be treated differently than failures due to other > > > reasons, though. > > > > Uh, yes; and they are. But that's not the point. > > > > The point really is that build failures rarely need maintainer > > intervention. Bothering the maintainer with things that do not concern > > them, therefore, seems of little point to me. > > And of course build failures that the maintainer must solve will result in > FTBFS bugs (sooner or later). And these will go to the PTS like all the > bugs.
That's the idea, yes. -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
