On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 07:31:13PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Those cases can be treated differently than failures due to other > > reasons, though. > Uh, yes; and they are. But that's not the point. > > The point really is that build failures rarely need maintainer > intervention. Bothering the maintainer with things that do not concern > them, therefore, seems of little point to me.
I try to rephrase my point. If build failures which do not concern maintainers can be distinguished from failures that do concern them, then we can mail maintainers only about the latter, avoiding bothering them with the former. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
