* Robert Collins wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 20:54 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > Is a new source package really needed? Is there no sensible
> > upgrade path? I had sort of hoped it could be as drop in and go as
> > most upgrades are, but perhaps not.
>
> Squid-3 will read the same config file, and the cache directory is
> compatible so there is indeed an upgrade path. Its not a total
> rewrite - its a port of the squid 2.5 C source to C++, but ....
>
> squid 3.0 is not yet 'stable'. Squid 2.5 is still the stable series.
Why not just uploading squid 3.0 to experimental?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
