Luigi Gangitano dijo [Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 02:14:46PM +0200]: > > Il giorno 25/apr/06, alle ore 07:12, Norbert Tretkowski ha scritto: > >>squid 3.0 is not yet 'stable'. Squid 2.5 is still the stable series. > > > >Why not just uploading squid 3.0 to experimental? > > Because it's not a short term package. It will be there for at least > 6 months. > > And experimental is not enough used to guarantee proper testing of > this new version.
Hmh, six months... Please keep in mind that we plan on releasing Etch in little more than six months - This means that, if you upload Squid3 to unstable, Etch might end up shipping Squid 2.5 and an almost-there-but-not-there-yet Squid 3. A situation similar to what happened in Sarge with mod_perl for Apache2, where the official version (including a late API change) was released two weeks after Sarge had frozen. I also suggest you to use experimental for this. If you want a wider test base, maybe set up an unofficial repository and publicize it. Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
