This one time, at band camp, Martin Zobel-Helas said: > I don't see any reason accepting packages into debian-volatile, when > they contain no volatile data. Also if the package will be in the next > stable point-release i don't see any reason why to put it into > volatile...
I am sorry to say, but I have to agree with zobel here. The changes aren't exactly what I think of when I think of the voltile archive mandate (although again, perhaps that needs to be better spelled out so as to make things more clear). Additionally, exim4 packages are already available in s-p-u, so I don't see a pressing reason to make them available in another repository. I am willing to be convinced I am wrong here, but at first blush I don't see it as suitable. Take care, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
