* Stephen Gran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060304 12:33]: > This one time, at band camp, Martin Zobel-Helas said: > > I don't see any reason accepting packages into debian-volatile, when > > they contain no volatile data. Also if the package will be in the next > > stable point-release i don't see any reason why to put it into > > volatile... > > I am sorry to say, but I have to agree with zobel here. The changes > aren't exactly what I think of when I think of the voltile archive > mandate (although again, perhaps that needs to be better spelled out so > as to make things more clear). Additionally, exim4 packages are already > available in s-p-u, so I don't see a pressing reason to make them > available in another repository. > > I am willing to be convinced I am wrong here, but at first blush I don't > see it as suitable.
Well, if s-p-u would *only* contained approved packages for the next point release, I would agree with you. However, s-p-u contains any kind of packages right now. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
