Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 12:36 schrieb Daniel Leidert: >> Am Freitag, den 10.02.2006, 12:09 +0100 schrieb Hendrik Sattler: >> > I about packaging a library that ships an API reference in docbook SGML >> > and provides manual build targets for PDF, PS and HTML. >> > >> > Is there any preference on which type should be included in the -dev >> > package? >> >> Why don't you move it into -doc packages, which is IMHO more common >> practice? You could make a -doc-html, -doc-ps and -doc-pdf, which all >> provide -doc and then let the -dev package recommend or suggest the -doc >> package. So the user can choose the format he prefers. > > For one file? > Another alternative, maybe: include only the .sgml file and > Suggests: docbook-utils
Well, i personally like very much to have all (well a lot of) my documentation accessible, and searchable by dwww. For this I would want the html to be already generated, and I'm probably not the only one. Why not just create a -doc package that contain the tree of them, or may be only pdf and html (but there will be people to disagree with me on this). -- Rémi Vanicat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
