Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 12:36 schrieb Daniel Leidert: >> Am Freitag, den 10.02.2006, 12:09 +0100 schrieb Hendrik Sattler: >> > I about packaging a library that ships an API reference in docbook SGML >> > and provides manual build targets for PDF, PS and HTML. >> > >> > Is there any preference on which type should be included in the -dev >> > package? >> >> Why don't you move it into -doc packages, which is IMHO more common >> practice? You could make a -doc-html, -doc-ps and -doc-pdf, which all >> provide -doc and then let the -dev package recommend or suggest the -doc >> package. So the user can choose the format he prefers. > > For one file? > Another alternative, maybe: include only the .sgml file and > Suggests: docbook-utils
If would be nice if doc-base could handle registration of SGML/XML
documentation, and then generate the docs in the formats of your
choice.
Is the docbook toolchain is yet robust enough to be able to do that?
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
pgp7q1sfJN1no.pgp
Description: PGP signature
