On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:43:48PM -0500, Ian Murdock wrote: > Fact is, the potential for confusion here never even occurred to > me when we started doing this at Progeny. Quite the contrary to what > Matthew suggests, it seems to me that changing the Maintainer > field is a perfectly reasonable thing to do now that I'm aware of it.
Ah, my apologies. I'd assumed it was something that you'd probably have thought about, so I'll happily withdraw that. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
