> Is there anyone from Debian who thinks that changing the Maintainer
> field is a bad idea in these cases (remember that this isn't about
> credit, because we would certainly request that the Debian maintainer
> still be mentioned as such in a suitable fashion)?


So deep in a thread that certainly can be called a flamewar, you
probably need to quietly ask this elsewhere if you want answers from a
real majority of ppl..:-)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to