[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > On Oct 21, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Your message would seem less confrontational if you would deign to explain >> *why* Linux-specific kernel features are important in a ping implementation.
> Because features like ping -M are of invaluable help when investigating > issues more complex than "is $host alive?", and I do not want to lose > them in favour of support for they toy Debian port of the day. > There is nothing wrong with toys, everybody have some, but they are not > supposed to interfere with important stuff. How on earth does supporting that feature require incompatibility with other systems? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
