On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:41:48PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > It seems like the 'sensible' thing to do might be to provide both. > Typically I would think the standard 'ping' would be, well, pretty > standard, and would work across multiple kernels/OSes/etc. We could > also have an 'lping' or some such which supported all the > latest-greatest linux-based stuff.
How about naming the packages netkit-ping and iputils-ping, respectively? Oh, wait, we have that already... iputils-arping also has a more portable, alternative implementation (cf. package arping). That leaves us with tracepath that indeed appears to be Linux-only at the moment. But then we have a couple of traceroute packages that offer roughly similar functionality. So what's all the fuzz about? Daniel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
