Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That would work for the library issue, and would "only" makes some > packages FTBFS because tetex changed (but I can think we can live with > that). Even better, if you do it right, you can change the > libkpathsea-dev to libkpathsea4-dev if TeTeX-3.0 has reached testing,
I don't understand - do you mean that I change the name from libkpathsea4-dev to libkpathsea-dev, or that not *me*, but the depending packages' maintainers will change their build-dep from libkpathsea-dev to libkpathsea4-dev? > and then the depending programs will slowly flow in (and that library > transition wouldn't be as blocking as a normal one). If my second interpretation is right, we depend on maintainers' action for that. In order to make all dependencies on the old version disappear, would a "still depends on libkpathsea3" bug be RC? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
