* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050929 10:07]: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote: > >> If my second interpretation is right, we depend on maintainers' action > >> for that. In order to make all dependencies on the old version > >> disappear, would a "still depends on libkpathsea3" bug be RC? > > > > Yes, fixable with a quick-and-dirty NMU that only does a rebuild against the > > new one...
> That was what I was thinking about; but the question is whether the > release team would actually support such a severity; I don't want to > support libkpathsea3 for a long time (although AFAICT it didn't change > at all during the lifetime of teTeX-2.0.2). It has been practice for quite some time to bump up "depends on $package" to RC-grade once removal of $package is very near. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
