* Blars Blarson: > Would it be acceptable to reject or drop more non-spam? (We could > reject on CBL, getting rid of about half the spam and rejecting about > one non-spam per day. CBL is easy to get off of.)
CBL has the advantage that you can make a local copy of the list (which reduces name server load and avoids the name lookup latency), but its license is somewhat non-free. Is this a problem for Debian? What's causing most of the load right now? I think some of the effort should probably concentrate on getting legitimate mail through faster. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
