On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:47:21PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > spamscan is single-threaded, and the latency of DNSBL lookups is the > main delay. We have less than 1 second to process each message on > average. Any good recomendations for a perl inter-process > communications library? Once it becomes multi-threaded CPU usage > could become an issue, especially if we upgrade to spamassassin 3.
What's wrong with using native perl threads and mutexes ? -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
