Hi, * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050823 03:32]: > On the other hand I feel that a port with even 80% of all packages > available can be very very usefull. Even a port without any X can be > usefull if that lack of software is intentional and not just inability > to build something. Ports should have some disgression at what they > put into Packages-arch-specific or Not-for-us.
It might be usefull for a certain value of usefullness, but we're not going to release it. > Maybe the 98% rule was just a look at > http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week-big.png or > http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-week-big.png and then picking a > number so that the archs they want in are above it. :) No. 98% ist the number where users usually start crying to the release team that there packages are out-of-date and if that can be ignored for now. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
