On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:13:35AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > On 05-Aug-21 03:58, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > - must have successfully compiled 98% of the archive's source (excluding > > arch-specific packages)
> It is not possible to build 98% of the unmodified source packages from > the 'unstable' distribution. This is true for any port including i386. > For the current 'unstable' distribution it is not even possible to build > 90% of the unmodified source packages because of the ongoing transitions > and the high number of FTBFS bugs. Yes, which isn't really a porter problem. The result is that it will be rather difficult for a while to *measure* how well ports are keeping up, so there's probably just no sense in trying to until things cool down in unstable. > I followed the 'unstable' distribution since the beginning of 2004 > with private buildds on different architectures and I recreated the > complete 'unstable' distribution many times from scratch by rebuilding > every package. It was hardly ever possible to build more than 95% > of the unmodified source packages from 'unstable' at any given point in > time, even when the number of FTBFS bugs was much lower than it is now. > I understand that the amd64 port has to be recompiled for the > final inclusion into the official archive because the current amd64 > packages have not been built by DDs. But currently more than 10% of > the unmodified source packages from 'unstable' FTBFS. It will likely > take many months, if not years, for amd64 to get anywhere near to the > requested 98% mark again. > Will the amd64 port be rejected if more than two percent of the > unmodified source packages from 'unstable' fail to compile? The amd64 port would be held to this standard just like all of the others. I don't think this should actually pose a problem for a port with a committed porter team; Debian has a proud history of sourceful porter NMUs, after all. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
