Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jul 29, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well, please note that posh is not the only shell that lacks support for > > local. IIRC, it also breaks down under one or more of dash and busybox sh. > dash supports local, or at least supports it in the way it's used in > all the packages I maintain and use.
AFAIR busybox sh doesn't (at least in the version used for the d-i udeb). Thiemo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
