On Aug 01, David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we should require that a base install should be POSIX > compliant; for everything else we can be a bit more lax. I see lack of a rationale here.
> But unlike some others, I don't see the point of rejecting patches > to fix XSI:isms/bashisms in various shell scripts. It's one thing to I do. It's yet another divergence from upstream and it has no practical benefit. > Having POSIX-clean scripts also ensures that busybox sh will be > able to run the scripts, something that's *very* useful on embedded > Debian-based systems. I highly doubt that it's worth using busybox *and* normal debian packages on the same system. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
