On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:01:58 +0200, Jesus Climent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 09:25:22AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 01:13:16AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
>> wrote:
>> > to find their own (sometimes flawed) solution to a very common
>> > problem.
>>
>> Years using Linux: 10.
>>
>> Times I've absolutely needed an X-less boot when an XDM was
>> installed: 0.
>>
>> How common was that problem you were trying to solve, again?
> Years using linux: 11 (argh, or 12, i cannot even remember)
> Times I needed the above discussed feature: several.
> That common is common enough?
Not really. There is nothing to indicate that how you
fashioned your run levels would make sense for, say, me. People whoi
really want tailored run-levels often have very definite ideas about
how these run-levels would be tailored; it is unlikely that a
predefined solution designed by committee in Debian would suit their
needs, and they would have to roll their own, anyway, and a
predefined solution would just get in their way.
_Why_ did you not create you own run level schema, BTW, if you
have indeed needed them so often? (I haven't felt that itch yet, or I
would have; creating differentiated run levels is not exactly rocket
science).
manoj
--
"The Schizophrenic: An Unauthorized Autobiography"
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
