On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:47:38AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:01:58 +0200, Jesus Climent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> _Why_ did you not create you own run level schema, BTW, if you
> have indeed needed them so often? (I haven't felt that itch yet, or I
> would have; creating differentiated run levels is not exactly rocket
> science).
Because other did it for me. It is called LSB, and i think we should adhere to
it, while keeping the possibility of configuring your runlevels the way you
please.
The question is: why is the Debian default any better than the LSB one, if we
can keep the possibility of self-configuration?
--
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.6.10|Helsinki Finland
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
You're just jealous because I'm a real freak and you have to wear a mask.
--Penguin (Batman Returns)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
