Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:35:41 -0500 (CDT), Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > >> Fri, 3 Jun 2005 18:38:13 -0500 (CDT), >> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: >> > >> >> On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: >> >> > >> >> > 3 Future >> >> > >> >> > * fix the Debian Java Policy; >> >> > * update the Debian Java FAQ; >> >> > * more packages to pkg-java; >> >> > * every packages to cdbs; >> >> <SNIP> >> >> >> >> Why cdbs? I was under the impression that many people disliked/wer >> >> uncomfortable with it because of the complex way in which it employs >> >> makefiles. Wouldn't your packages be more accessible (in terms of >> >> other developers being able to patch/fix bugs/etc.) in a more >> >> universal format? >> > >> > I agree. A java policy should talk about how java packages should >> > interact once installed. But stay the hell away from how they are >> > built. >> >> I *never* said I wanted to put this in the Java Policy! > > Then why list it as the future? Doogie, «more packages to pkg-java» and «update the Debian Java FAQ» will not be in the Debian Java Policy! Cheers, -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
