On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 07:38 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 01:26:59PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 14:17 +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote: > > > El Viernes 27 Mayo 2005 14:09, Pierre Habouzit escribió: > > > > multimedia seems more appropriate. most of the video player actually are > > > > music player too, and some music player can show video with appropriate > > > > plugins (xmms e.g.) > > > > > > > > though, that would mean that 'sound' won't have that many package. so > > > > maybe we should rename sound into multimedia and populate it with video > > > > players too ? > > > > > > I support renaming sound into multimedia and include video and sound > > > stuff > > > there... > > > > What about players that only play sound? Like mpg321 and friends? > > That's hardly multimedia... > > Not every package in gnome is actually GNOME. They are components that > are useful in a GNOME environment. Likewise, every package in a > multimedia section does not specifically need to provide all multimedia > functions itself. It simply has to be useful in a multimedia > environment.
Then media players are just fine in graphics or sound, depending on which is their main focus (or they could even be in gnome or kde, or whatever). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
