On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:55:12AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 04:42:35PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > >... > > According to <http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/>, the official > > count of release-critical bugs affecting testing is 61. Since security > > bugs are an, er, "renewable resource", and can be fixed out-of-band, we > > can exclude them from our reckoning and get the number at the bottom of > > <http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php?ignore=sid&ignsec=on> instead, > > which is 41. This is pretty good progress, but it's still a far cry > > from the estimate of 15 RC bugs that our timeline called for by this > > Wednesday. We fortunately did put a little bit of padding into this > > timeline, but being off on the RC count by a factor of 2-3 is stretching > > things a bit, y'know? > >...
> I'm not a big fan of your metric, but if you are using it please note > that at least the following issues make your numbers at the URL you are > referring to [1] lower than they actually are: > - relevant pseudo-packages are not listed (the "kernel" pseudo-package > alone has 3 RC bugs) Fair point, thanks. > - the exclusion of bugs that are tagged both "sarge" and "sid" > (e.g. #303860) is obviously wrong Actually, it's the tags that are now wrong on that bug, because celestia has been removed from sarge. 'ignore=sid' ignores bugs that *only* apply to sid. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
