On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 01:49:06AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > - the exclusion of bugs that are tagged both "sarge" and "sid"
> >  (e.g. #303860) is obviously wrong

> BTW: is there a way to make unstable updates not close the bugs in question
> but mark them woody and/or sarge? If not, should the changelog simply
> contain unparseable bug numbers?

I would really prefer that maintainers upload as normal, closing bugs in the
changelog; they can be reopened afterwards if they need to be tracked
long-term.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to