Moin Patrick! Patrick Ouellette schrieb am Freitag, den 22. April 2005: > > And the more time passes, it becomes more and more complicated since > > additional transitions might be interdependent with a transition making > > the problem even more complicated. > > > > You are very good at repeating "this will never work." You are
Please, do the math (literally, the particular are is stochastics). > > People who want stability use stable. > > > It is not true today. What is true is people who are not running > hardware less than 36 (or so) months old have the option of running <the rest of usual standard bitching about woody-out-of-date-ness deleted> > People are not able to choose by their desired "comfort level" of > stability. If anything, my proposal might allow people to choose which > version they want to run based on their desired level of stability - > instead of what will run on their hardware. And I still cannot see the innovation in your idea. It is basically a second testing with stronger conditions - and the current one has already failed in respect of the original requirements. Regards, Eduard. -- <stockholm> Overfiend: why dont you flame him? you are good at that. <Overfiend> I have too much else to do. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]