On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 13:58:31 -0400, Patrick Ouellette wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 04:24:34PM -0500, Adam M wrote: >> In many ways, current testing is your stable. Extending the testing >> period from testing to your proposed candidate and then stable would >> do nothing about normal bugs. RC bugs are usually found quite quickly >> by people using unstable.
> If RC bugs are found so quickly in unstable, why has there been no > release in the last 3 or so years? Testing is normally quite usable. > That is part of the reason I believe this type of approach to releases > would work.
Perhaps because RC bugs are not the only problem to resolve in order to release. Indeed, security build seems to be a biggest problem.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
