On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:12:45AM +0100, Benjamin Mesing wrote: > Hello, > > > The Vancouver proposals satisfy all of these, potentially at the cost of > > removing some architectures from the set released by Debian. If we want > > to avoid that cost, can we come up with another proposal that solves the > > same problems in a way that satisfies the release team? > > There was a proposal first made by Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [1] and than > (independently) made by me [2] where we proposed to freeze testing even > if some architectures are not ready yet, and use > testing-proposed-updates to make the architectures release ready later. > As I have elaborated in [2] this approach has the potential to solve the > points addressed in the Vancoover proposal. As these proposals where > nearly not discussed and especially there were no objections/arguments > against it I want to bring up this proposal again as it might have been > lost in the noise because the posts were located in the original "Bits > (Nybbles?)..." thread.
Except Steve said his criteria's where non-negotiable, so ... Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
