On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 01:13:15PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 01:11:32AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > You didn't answer the question I asked. Do you believe that DSA should be > > spending its limited resources keeping hardware running for dead > > architectures? > No. They never did, and they never should. The fact that some people are > involved with both DSA and buildd maintenance doesn't mean DSA, as a > group, has anything to do with buildd maintenance. - the Debian System Administrators (DSA) must be willing to support debian.org machine(s) of that architecture - there must be a developer-accessible debian.org machine for the architecture. Who maintains crest.debian.org? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
