On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 11:04 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:

> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> How could we know ? We know nothing about Ubuntu, nothing about
> >> Canonical, nothing about the goals, nothing about how everything was
> >> done to begin with, nothing about who works or doesn't work there.
> >
> > Details about Ubuntu and its goals can be found on the website.  In many
> > respects there is more information available about Ubuntu activity, and the
> > goals of the project, than about organizations which provide you with the
> > essentials of life.  Yet, you seem to trust them by default, while you
> > assume that Ubuntu seeks to cause you harm.  Why?
> 
> Because Ubuntu appeared behind a screen of smoke. And smoke hasn't
> dissipated yet. Debian Developers were not informed in an appropriate
> manner of what was going on there.
> 
Hasn't dissipated yet?!  Everything about Ubuntu is public, and
available from http://www.ubuntu.com/ - right down to logs of the
bi-weekly technical board and community council meetings.

> >> Everything was done with the exact same secret used for this plan. And
> >> nobody cared enough to write up a proper announcement for Debian
> >> developers.
> >
> > An announcement of what?  The release meeting, or Ubuntu?  You'd be wrong in
> > either case, as can be easily shown by mailing list archives.
> 
> Ubuntu. Sure, there was a mail posted to -devel. It basically said
> "Hey folks, look there, we're doing something, there are patches. We
> have no name yet.". It said nothing else. It did not even list the
> people involved. We had to find out by hanging out on IRC. Nice way of
> treating your fellows, indeed.
> 
Your employers have never posted a list of Debian Developers they
employ.  Nor has anybody elses.  It was left to individual employees to
decide whether they wished to have their employment known or not.

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to