On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:43:10AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 01:28:15PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Op ma, 14-03-2005 te 16:09 -0800, schreef Steve Langasek: > > > You do know that m68k is the only architecture still carrying around > > > 2.*2* kernels in sarge? > > > False. See sparc32. > > $ madison -a sparc -s testing -r 'kernel.*2\.2' > $ > > ? > > > Even if it is true that we do still carry 2.2 into sarge, that is only > > for Mac; not for any of the other subarchitectures. > > Nevertheless, it is a factor that contributes negatively to the > maintainability of a stable release...
Well, we could drop mac/m68k supported subarch then ? For that matter, it would probably make sense to drop 2.4 kernels fully in the not so far future. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
