On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 02:44:52PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > There were offers of help in man power and machines for archs that had
> > problems in keeping up. Those were rejected. Punishing those archs for the
> > mistakes of those buildd admins rejecting helping hands is just plain
> > stupid. The user is the one who will suffer from that "decision".
> Notice that one of the main arch having problem some time back was arm, and
> the buildd where maintained by who ? elmo.
Similar for mips several times and for Ryan...
Remember that qt-x11-free fiasco from beginning of last year on mips(el)
where qt-x11-free was stuck in weak-no-autobuild for weeks holding back upto
70 packages back then? This was a clear problem of the buildd admin, not of
the arch.
--
Ciao... //
Ingo \X/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
