On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:42:54PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:31:30PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > > I'd propose to use a less "discriminating" name for the scc archive. > > What about ports.debian.org (which coincidentally already exists and > > http-wise points to http://www.debian.org/ports/)? > > You are probably risking confusion with BSD's ports system.
We've actually used "ports" in this sense for years, so I don't see the risk. In any case, that confusion would probably benefit us, even, since BSD's "ports" is equivalent to "unsupported software we provide for the benefit of our end-users but we cannot fully support due to lack of resources" [1] so that would fit our definition even if a 'port' in our sense would be an architecture, and not a specific software package. Regards Javier [1] Slightly based on http://www.openbsd.org/ports.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
