* Joey Hess: > I think we've taken this "security bugs arn't fixed in testing as well > as in stable" thing as gospel a little too long without verifying it > lately. I've been checking and if testing is lagging stable at all, it's > doing so by a much smaller amount than we've traditionally thought.
I think that's because of the pending release, in particular frozen base packages, and not representative for the whole release cycle. If a switch to a new upstream version of libc runs into problems, testing and unstable will diverge again, maybe for weeks or months. testing-security intends to solve this, though.
