On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:31:06 +0100, Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >You wrote: >> ahh .. I take your point. What about the idea of identifying a list of >> release essential (RE) packages? > >I like that idea. We could even have a system to automagically throw >buggy non-RE packages out of testing.
That would leave testing users who happen to have such a package installed alone because they wouldn't notice their package vanishing from the mirrors, continuing to use a potentially vulnerable package. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
