On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 02:36:52PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote: > Bill Allombert wrote: > > >But overriding them means we lose the certification ? > > > > > We can't allow it to be the case that overriding due to an existing and > unremedied security issue causes loss of certification. There's no > common sense in that.
Then could you elaborate the scope of the certification ? It is one of the main contender for me. I though the certification require to ship the exact same binary as provided by the LCC. Adding support for SE Linux (for example, I am not pushing SE Linux) can imply rebuild some softwares with configure --with-selinux and link them with libselinux.so. They certainly won't be identical to the LLC one. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here.
