Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 07 December 2004 11:22, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Fortunately, though, pictures of naked dogs are *not* considered >> to be appealing to prurient interests. Unless, *maybe*, a hyper- >> horny 13 year old boy is seeing a picture of dogs copulating, and >> not in the context of some "scientific value", i.e., a text book. >> Even in that case, though, the boy would probably be told to wash >> his hand and stop being a pervert. > > So you have no objections to bestiality web sites then? > > Some years ago a server in Amsterdam that I was running was overloaded due to > thousands of downloads per hour of a bestiality AVI. I removed the site due > to technical reasons (the entire ISP ran slow because of all the bestiality > downloads).
Did this AVI really show dogs copulating with each other (not pervert humans with a dog)? And people downloaded this in masses? The world is strange. Bye, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
