On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 00:48:47 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 00:27 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 15:49:08 -0500, William Ballard
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 06:28:14PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
>> > wrote:
>> >> might want, and put it on non-us since it is illegal to
>> >> distribute such things in the USA (and unlike the possibility of
>> >> offending people's sensibilities, THIS is a real issue as things
>> >> stand). While at it, we
>>
>> > They have had quite a few major busts of child pornographers in
>> > Europe and also Asia. Europe doesn't tolerate *everything*.
>>
>> Kinda irrelevant. I don't see them shutting down the Louvre.
> Because the paintings/statues in the Louvre are considered "bona
> fide works of art, having serious literary, artistic, educational or
> scientific value."
And Bruno Bellamy paintings are so very obviously not art, eh?
And you are who, the culture police?
manoj
--
Computers can figure out all kinds of problems, except the things in
the world that just don't add up.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
