> Give me *one* authoritative definition of pornography that applies to > this picture. Until you give me one, I'll consider all the ones I've > seen so far to be the accurate ones, and none of them say these pictures > are pornography.
It's been said that pornography is other people's erotism. Pornography is what is forbidden to show/do in public, and its definition may vary from one country to another or according to context. For instance you surely would be titilliated by hot-babe if you had been grown in an conservative environnement, whether sikh, wasp or inquisitorist. However, I see two kind of pronography : -the one whose purpose is only to show a material condemned by law, in order to satisfy the frustrations that prohibitive laws generate. It is by nature commercial and illegal (or the law may build a niche for it to exist). -the one that is solely comdemned by law because it shows what one musn't show, but its first purpose was not to show a condemned material, the transgression is accidental. To protect the latter kind is to protect the freedom of knowledge. -- Be kind, cc: me :-)
