On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 00:02:48 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:36:50PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 04:06:13PM +0000, Helen Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > I think that is the main issue here. I would like to believe >> > that Debian is capable of showing more respect for other people >> > than including hotbabe in the distribution would indicate. >> >> Yeah, i would like Debian to show more respect for me, by removing >> emacs and kde. >> >> Ah, the guy next door says he wants respect as well, and asks >> removal of vim and gnome. >> >> I'm pushing the thing to the absurd, but do you realise what you >> are saying is absolutely ridiculous ? > Really, you can't see any difference between kde and hot-babe? > Does NM include a half-a-clue check? Sure. Let us include an inquisition phase in NM that tests candidate DD's for moral pulchritude as well, and make sure they all practice RightThink. manoj -- I have never been one to sacrifice my appetite on the altar of appearance. A.M. Readyhough Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C