Good evening Thibaut, Am 2004-12-01 18:15:48, schrieb Thibaut VARENE:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 17:34:34 +0100 > Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, but in some countries there is pornography > > and nudity illegal. Like arabian and persian countries. > > This is neither nudity nor pornography, this is a cartoon picture. I know, but cartoons ar faling into the same category. > Then don't install it. I do not need to install it... If someon know I have the CD... I will HAVE problems. > What you are doing here has a name: it is "spreading FUD". No one is going > to get killed because of that software, what you are saying here is very > dangerous and rude. ??? There was a 15 years old Boy for two or three years in Iran and he was hanged-up because he was searchin for a program, downloaded it and it was containing a Dialer which had downloaded Erotic pics... On 26.7.2004 there was a 16 years girls hanged-up because she was violated and the man had told the justice, she was his girlfriend. Minimal punishment for him and death for her. I was already on time 17 and another time 3 month in prison... ...for nothing ! I do not like to continue this in Iran. > If you are not confident enough with your english level, i suggest you > check your wording in a dictionary. This program can _at most_ be > qualified as being "erotic", certainly not "pornographic". Do you think, the Aiatholla make a difference between ? > There have been threads and flames in the past about various programs > being part of Debian (such as dopewar) and they have proven to be moot > points most of the time. What goes in Debian is decided according to the > Debian Policy, and the DFSG. This is a technical and licence issue... > This program is fully DFSG-compliant. As for the "local law policy", > unless i'm very wrong, Debian already provides software which is "illegal" > in some countries (such as cryptographic software). This has never been a > problem, hopefully, otherwise Debian lawyers would have a very hard time > checking all countries (that's a few hundreds, iirc) local laws, and we > would end with not much being in the Debian archive. Cryptographical Software is one thing erotic/pronography another. > The Debian archive provides a set of packages, a collection of open source > software that you can find on the Internet anyway. You are supposed to > pick up in that collection whatever you want/need. Nothing forces you to > install something you don't want/dislike, you are supposed to act like a > grown up, after all. Right, if the upstream of "hot-babe" create a private repository or find some others to create a collection in a seperatly debian-repository, it would be the best. Distributing of erotic as real or cartoon in Debian can make problems. > Please don't mix your own opinions with a more general debate. You are > free to dislike that piece of software, but you cannot spread FUD to > illustrate your ideas. You was never in a persian (Iran, Tadshikistan, Afghanistan) or arabian country... So you do not know whhats going on there. You do not know the risk. Greetings Michelle -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/3/88452356 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
